Maintaining the artemisinin content through direct and indirect <i>in vitro</i> regeneration and their assessment of variations with the field grown mother plants of <i>Artemisia annua</i> L.

doi:10.1007/s13659-012-0047-7

Natural Products and Bioprospecting

2012, Vol. 2

Issue (5) : 194-199 DOI: 10.1007/s13659-012-0047-7

Regular Article

Maintaining the artemisinin content through direct and indirect in vitro regeneration and their assessment of variations with the field grown mother plants of Artemisia annua L.

Shilpi PAUL, Madan M GUPTA, Suman P S KHANUJA

Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants(CSIR), Lucknow, India

Abstract
References
Related Articles
Metrics

Download: PDF(1050 KB) HTML ()
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract An efficient protocol for maintaining the artemisinin content in tissue culture and high frequency of in vitro direct and indirect regenerations of multiple shoots of high artemisinin yielding genotypes of Artemisia annua has been developed and their comparison with field grown mother plant has been carried out. The eleven elite genotypes(containing more than 1% artemisinin) were tested on seven different modified media formulations. Modified half MS(Murashige and Skoog's) media containing 100 mg L^-1 myo-inositol, 0.5 g L^-1 casine hydrolysate, 5 mg L^-1 biotin, 2 mL L^-1 RT(Revised Tobacco) vitamin stock, 0.5 mg L^-1 BAP and 0.01 mg L^-1 NAA showed best regeneration while, above modified MS medium containing 0.2 mg L^-1 BAP and 0.2 mg L^-1 NAA showed maximum shoot multiplication with maintained artemisinin content. Based on the chemical profiles of both the systems, minor difference was observed in their artemisinin content. A large scale culture of these plants maintained the normal growth index along with the artemisinin content and could be a better alternative to maintain the high artemisinin yielding genotypes with their genetic constraint in specific media combinations and also used as base material for further genetic improvement.

Keywords direct and indirect regeneration Artemisia annua artemisinin BAP NAA

Fund:The authors are grateful to Directors of Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants(CSIR), Lucknow for their interest and availing the necessary resources and financial support towards this study.

Issue Date: 11 February 2018

	Service

	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

	Shilpi PAUL
	Madan M GUPTA
	Suman P S KHANUJA

Trendmd:

Cite this article:

Shilpi PAUL,Madan M GUPTA,Suman P S KHANUJA. Maintaining the artemisinin content through direct and indirect in vitro regeneration and their assessment of variations with the field grown mother plants of Artemisia annua L.[J]. Natural Products and Bioprospecting, 2012, 2(5): 194-199.

URL:

http://npb.kib.ac.cn/EN/10.1007/s13659-012-0047-7 OR http://npb.kib.ac.cn/EN/Y2012/V2/I5/194

[1]	Mutabingwa, T. K. Acta Tropica. 2005, 95, 305-315.
[2]	Congpuong, K.; Bualombai, P.; Vanmairuroi, V.; Na-Bangchang. Malaria J. 2010, 9, 43-51.
[3]	Balint, G. A. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2001, 90, 261-265.
[4]	Baldi, A.; Dixit, V. K. Bio. Tech. 2007, 99, 4609-4614.
[5]	Adjuik, M.; Babiker, A.; Garner, P.; Olliaro, P.; Taylor, W.; White, N. Lancet 2004, 363, 9-17.
[6]	Liersch, R.; Soicke, H.; Stehr, C.; Tullner, H. U. Planta Med. 1986, 52, 387-390.
[7]	Ferreira, J. F. S.; Simon, J. E.; Janick, J. Planta Med. 1995, 61, 351-355.
[8]	Khanuja, S. P. S.; Paul, S.; Shasany, A. K.; Gupta, A. K.; Darokar, M. P.; Gupta, M. M.; Verma, R. K.; Govind, R.; Kumar, A.; Lal, R. K.; Bansal, R. P.; Singh, A. K.; Bhakuni, R. S.; Tandon, S. US Patent No:7,375,260, 2008.
[9]	Martinez, B. C.; Staba, J. Adv. Cell Cult. 1988, 6, 69-87.
[10]	Elhag, H. M.; El, Feraly. F. S.; Mossa, J. S.; Hafez, M. J. King Saud Uni. Agric. Sci. 1991, 33, 251-259.
[11]	Fulzele, D. P. A.; Sipahimalane, Heble. M. R. Phytother. Res. 1991, 5, 149-153.
[12]	Whipkey, A.; Simon, J. E.; Charls, D. J.; Janick, J. J. Herb Spices Med. Plants 1992, 1, 15-25.
[13]	Ferreira, J. F. S.; Janick, J. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cul. 1996, 44, 211-217.
[14]	Jha, J.; Jha, T. B.; Mahato, S. B. Curr. Sci. 1988, 57, 344-346.
[15]	Woerdenbag, H. J.; Lfiers, J. F. J.; Van, Uden. W.; Pras, N.; Malingr, Th. M.; Alfermann, A. W. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 1993, 32, 247-257.
[16]	Paniego, N. B.; Giulietti, A. M. Enz. Microb. Tech. 1996, 18, 526-530.
[17]	Delabays, N.; Benakis, A.; Collet, G. Acta Hort. 1993, 330, 203-206.
[18]	Gupta, M. M.; Jain D. C.; Mathur, K.; Singh, A. K.; Verma, R. K. Planta Med. 1996, 62, 280-282.
[19]	Paul, S.; Khanuja, S. P. S; Shasany, A. K.; Gupta, M. M.; Darokar, M. P.; Saikia, D.; Gupta, A. K. Planta Med. 2010, 76, 1468-1472.
[20]	Jaziri, M.; Shimomur, A. K.; Yoshimatsu, K. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 145, 175-177.
[21]	Brown, G. D. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 975-977.
[22]	Nair, M. S. R.; Acton, N.; Klayman, D. L.; Kendrick, K.; Basile, D. V.; Mante, S. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 49, 504-507.
[23]	Nguyen, K. T.; Arsenault, P. R.; Weathers, P. J. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47, 329-338.
[24]	Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. Physiol. Plant 1962, 15, 473-497.
[25]	Simon, J. E.; Charls, D.; Cebert, L.; Grant, J.; Janick, J.; Whipkey, A. Artemisia annua L. a promising aromatic and medicinal. In:J. Janick, J, Simon, J. E. (eds.) Advances in new crops. Timber press. Portland, OR 1990, 522-526.
[26]	Yann, L. K.; Jelodar, N. B.; Keng, C. L. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2012, 1835-2707.
[27]	Kumar, S.; Gupta, S. K.; Singh, P.; Bajpai, P.; Gupta, M. M.; Singh, D.; Gupta, A. K.; Ram, G.; Shasany, A. K.; Sharma, S. Ind. Crops and Prod. 2004, 19, 71-78.
[28]	Jamaleddine, Z. O.; Lyam, P.; Fajimi, O.; Giwa, A.; Aina, A.; Lawyer, E. F.; Okere, A. U.; Odofin, W. T. Afr. J. Biotech. 2011, 10, 17841-17844.
[29]	Laughlin, J. C.; Heazlewood, G. N.; Beattie, B. M. Cultivation of Artemisia annua L. In Artemisia, Wright, C.W.; Ed. Taylor & Francis:2002, 18, 159-195.
[30]	Keng, C. L.; Nallammai, S.; Boey, P. L. AsPac J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2010, 18, 139-141.
[31]	Kumar, S.; Banerjee, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Gupta, M. M.; Verma, R. K.; Jain, D. C.; Khanuja, S. P. S.; Mathur, A. K.; Bagchi, G. D.; Zehra, M.; Metha, V. K.; Naqvi, A. A.; Paul, S.; Ram, G.; Ram, M.; Sakia, D.; Sanghwan, R. S.; Santhakumar, T. R.; Shasany, A. K.; Daroker, M. P.; Singh, A. K.; Singh, A. J. Med. Arom. Plant Sci. 1999, 21, 47-48.
[32]	Khanna, P.; Staba, J. Lloydia 1968, 31, 180-189.
[33]	Gupta, M. M.; Jain, D. C.; Verma, R. K.; Gupta, A. P. J. Med. Arom. Plant Sci. 1996, 18, 5-6.
[34]	Khanuja, S. P. S.; Shasany, A.; Darokar, M. P.; Kumar, S. Plant Mol. Bio. Rep. 1999, 17, 1-7.
[35]	Nei, M. G.; Li, W. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1979, 76, 5269-5273.
[36]	Singh, R. K.; Chaudhary, B. D. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Pub. New Delhi, 1979.

[1]	Hui Liu, Xingyong Liu, Li Zhang. Computational Analysis of Artimisinin Derivatives on the Antitumor Activities[J]. Natural Products and Bioprospecting, 2017, 7(6): 433-443.
[2]	Mounir Tilaoui, Hassan Ait Mouse, Abdeslam Jaafari, Abdelmajid Zyad. Differential Effect of Artemisinin Against Cancer Cell Lines[J]. Natural Products and Bioprospecting, 2014, 4(3): 189-196.
[3]	Elmar Breuer, Thomas Efferth. Treatment of Iron-Loaded Veterinary Sarcoma by Artemisia annua[J]. Natural Products and Bioprospecting, 2014, 4(2): 113-118.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed